Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
In this paper, Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen explore whether people are incidentally exposed to news on social media. In other words, are people who use social networks like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, shown news even as they use them for other reasons. The analysis, based on data from 4 countries, finds that they are, with the boost from incidental exposure even greater for younger people and those with low interest in the news.
Abstract: Scholars have questioned the potential for incidental exposure in high-choice media environments. We use online survey data to examine incidental exposure to news on social media (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter) in four countries (Italy, Australia, United Kingdom, United States). Leaving aside those who say they intentionally use social media for news, we compare the number of online news sources used by social media users who do not see it as a news platform, but may come across news while using it (the incidentally exposed), with people who do not use social media at all (non-users). We find that (a) the incidentally exposed users use significantly more online news sources than non-users, (b) the effect of incidental exposure is stronger for younger people and those with low interest in news and (c) stronger for users of YouTube and Twitter than for users of Facebook.
Journalism in the Age of Social Media
Reuters Institute Fellow's Paper
Jennifer Alejandro, a Singaporean journalist of more than 15 years’ experience and currently a news anchor at Channel News Asia, has studied how new social media like Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and LinkedIn have affected the way news organisations and news journalists operate.
In her paper, calledJournalism in the Age of Social Media, Jenny includes a survey about social media usage in news operations among selected chief editors from different parts of the world. 5 out of the 6 editors surveyed said speed or immediacy was the aspect of social media that helps them best in receiving news. They said the main ways their newsrooms used social media networks were branding and making a presence in the social media sphere, driving traffic to the company’s news website, and breaking news.
The main risks they identified were concerns regarding accuracy, the need for verification and the loss of control over the information.
Jenny also surveyed 135 journalists about the ways social media have affected their work, the way newsgathering has changed and the way news information is disseminated. Amongst her findings are that in the web 2.0 world, journalists have to be ready to answer questions and be willing to face praise or criticism from members of the group.
She argues that they must also set aside time to check the replies or comments, and continue the thread of discussion. Jenny concludes that ‘Journalism is not dead but merely evolving and the journalists of the future need to reinvent themselves too.'
As with all Fellows’ research papers, any opinions expressed are those of the author and not of the Institute.
